World Blog by humble servant. Ukraine Chronicles.949 Solomon Islands PM suggests Australia’s reaction to China security deal is hysterical and hypocritical Manasseh Sogavare says he wasn’t told about Aukus pact until it was public while Scott Morrison accuses counterpart of parroting China’s lines
The prime minister of Solomon Islands has accused the Australian government of hypocrisy over his country’s security deal with China, saying the Aukus pact was far from transparent but he “did not become theatrical and hysterical”.
Manasseh Sogavare said Solomon Islands and other countries in the region “should have been consulted to ensure that this Aukus treaty is transparent since it will affect the Pacific family by allowing nuclear submarines in Pacific waters”.
The Australian prime minister, Scott Morrison, hit back on Friday afternoon, suggesting that Sogavare had changed his view based on “other influences” and that there was a “remarkable similarity between those statements and those of the Chinese government”.
Foreign affairs minister Marise Payne
Australia’s foreign minister denounces China’s ‘secret’ security deal with Solomon Islands
Read more
China announced last week that it had signed a security agreement with Solomon Islands, although the final terms of that deal are not yet public.
Australia, the UK and the US announced in mid-September they would deepen trilateral security cooperation through Aukus and launched a project to find the best way for Australia to acquire at least eight nuclear-propelled submarines.
The Australian foreign minister, Marise Payne, used a speech on Thursday to criticise the secrecy surrounding the Solomons security agreement while insisting “no document signed and kept away from public view” would change Australia’s commitment to answering Pacific island countries’ needs.
In an at-times defensive address to parliament in Honiara on Friday, Sogavare said the “western media” had accused Solomon Islands and China of showing a lack of transparency about the agreement. But Sogavare said he had first “learned of the Aukus treaty in the media”.
“One would expect that as a member of the Pacific family, Solomon Islands and members of the Pacific should have been consulted to ensure that this Aukus treaty is transparent, since it will affect the Pacific family by allowing nuclear submarines in Pacific waters,” Sogavare said.
“Oh, but I realise … that Australia is a sovereign country, and that it can enter into any treaty that it wants to, transparently or not – which is exactly what they did with [the] Aukus treaty.”
Sogavare added: “When Australia signed up to Aukus we did not become theatrical and hysterical on the implications this would have for us. We respected Australia’s decision. And I’m glad to say that Australia, United States of Australia and Japan respected our sovereignty to enter into this security agreement with China as well, based on trust and mutual respect.”
Morrison said had spoken with Sogavare the day after the Aukus announcement in September 2021, as part of a round of calls with many leaders briefing them on what had been negotiated in a “highly secure” environment.
Morrison said Australia had moved quickly to reassure the Pacific about Australia’s ongoing commitment to meet its nuclear non-proliferation obligations.
“I did have that conversation with the prime minister [Sogavare] the day following the announcement, and no issues were raised at that time in that discussion,” Morrison told reporters during an election campaign stop in Tasmania.
“But obviously, as time goes on and new relationships are entered into, there’s obviously been some clearly other influences in the perspective taken by the Solomon Islands prime minister. Now, I understand that.”
When a journalist asked whether Morrison was saying Sogavare was parroting China’s rhetoric, the Australian prime minister replied: “There’s a remarkable similarity between those statements and those of the Chinese government.”
China has been particularly critical of the Aukus agreement, seeing it as part of US efforts to contain it, and has emphasised nuclear non-proliferation risks.
A Chinese foreign ministry official, Wang Wenbin, told reporters on Wednesday that the US and Australia were guilty of “pure double standards”.
“The US shows no openness and transparency when it conducted nuclear tests and dumped nuclear wastes in the South Pacific region and when Aukus opened the Pandora’s box of nuclear proliferation in the Asia Pacific region,” Wang said.
Sogavare reiterated on Friday that Solomon Islands would not allow a Chinese military base in the country. He said he agreed with other leaders, including Morrison, that such a military base would not be in the interest of Solomon islands or the region.
But Sogavare said he found it “very, very offensive” that Canberra had flatly denied it refused to allow Australian police and defence force personnel to protect Chinese-built infrastructure and the Chinese embassy during last year’s riots in Honiara.
He said Solomon Islands was left “with no option but to enter into security agreement with our other bilateral partners to plug the gaps that exist in our security agreement with Australia”.
Solomons PM could use Chinese police to stay in power, key provincial adviser fears
“Solomon Islands is grateful for the security agreement that it has with Australia,” Sogavare said.
“However, the riots in 2006 and most recently the November riots have shown that even with Australia’s support we could not prevent half of Honiara from being razed to the ground.”
Sogavare said a stable Solomon Islands would lead to a stable Pacific and his country did not “subscribe to the view that only a partner or partners of the same ideology is able to do that”.
On Thursday, a key adviser to the premier of the most populous province in Solomon Islands expressed concern that the deal could enable Sogavare to use Chinese armed police and military personnel to quash democratic dissent and hold power for years to come.
… we have a small favour to ask. Tens of millions have placed their trust in the Guardian’s fearless journalism since we started publishing 200 years ago, turning to us in moments of crisis, uncertainty, solidarity and hope. More than 1.5 million supporters, from 180 countries, now power us financially – keeping us open to all, and fiercely independent.
Unlike many others, the Guardian has no shareholders and no billionaire owner. Just the determination and passion to deliver high-impact global reporting, always free from commercial or political influence. Reporting like this is vital for democracy, for fairness and to demand better from the powerful.
And we provide all this for free, for everyone to read. We do this because we believe in information equality. Greater numbers of people can keep track of the global events shaping our world, understand their impact on people and communities, and become inspired to take meaningful action. Millions can benefit from open access to quality, truthful news, regardless of their ability to pay for it.
If there were ever a time to join us, it is now. Every contribution, however big or small, powers our journalism and sustains our future
Australia, the UK and the US announced in mid-September they would deepen trilateral security cooperation through Aukus and launched a project to find the best way for Australia to acquire at least eight nuclear-propelled submarines.
The Australian foreign minister, Marise Payne, used a speech on Thursday to criticise the secrecy surrounding the Solomons security agreement while insisting “no document signed and kept away from public view” would change Australia’s commitment to answering Pacific island countries’ needs.
In an at-times defensive address to parliament in Honiara on Friday, Sogavare said the “western media” had accused Solomon Islands and China of showing a lack of transparency about the agreement. But Sogavare said he had first “learned of the Aukus treaty in the media”.
“One would expect that as a member of the Pacific family, Solomon Islands and members of the Pacific should have been consulted to ensure that this Aukus treaty is transparent, since it will affect the Pacific family by allowing nuclear submarines in Pacific waters,” Sogavare said.
“Oh, but I realise … that Australia is a sovereign country, and that it can enter into any treaty that it wants to, transparently or not – which is exactly what they did with [the] Aukus treaty.”
Sogavare added: “When Australia signed up to Aukus we did not become theatrical and hysterical on the implications this would have for us. We respected Australia’s decision. And I’m glad to say that Australia, United States of Australia and Japan respected our sovereignty to enter into this security agreement with China as well, based on trust and mutual respect.”
Morrison said had spoken with Sogavare the day after the Aukus announcement in September 2021, as part of a round of calls with many leaders briefing them on what had been negotiated in a “highly secure” environment.
Morrison said Australia had moved quickly to reassure the Pacific about Australia’s ongoing commitment to meet its nuclear non-proliferation obligations.
“I did have that conversation with the prime minister [Sogavare] the day following the announcement, and no issues were raised at that time in that discussion,” Morrison told reporters during an election campaign stop in Tasmania.
“But obviously, as time goes on and new relationships are entered into, there’s obviously been some clearly other influences in the perspective taken by the Solomon Islands prime minister. Now, I understand that.”
When a journalist asked whether Morrison was saying Sogavare was parroting China’s rhetoric, the Australian prime minister replied: “There’s a remarkable similarity between those statements and those of the Chinese government.”
China has been particularly critical of the Aukus agreement, seeing it as part of US efforts to contain it, and has emphasised nuclear non-proliferation risks.
A Chinese foreign ministry official, Wang Wenbin, told reporters on Wednesday that the US and Australia were guilty of “pure double standards”.
“The US shows no openness and transparency when it conducted nuclear tests and dumped nuclear wastes in the South Pacific region and when Aukus opened the Pandora’s box of nuclear proliferation in the Asia Pacific region,” Wang said.
Sogavare reiterated on Friday that Solomon Islands would not allow a Chinese military base in the country. He said he agreed with other leaders, including Morrison, that such a military base would not be in the interest of Solomon islands or the region.
But Sogavare said he found it “very, very offensive” that Canberra had flatly denied it refused to allow Australian police and defence force personnel to protect Chinese-built infrastructure and the Chinese embassy during last year’s riots in Honiara.
He said Solomon Islands was left “with no option but to enter into security agreement with our other bilateral partners to plug the gaps that exist in our security agreement with Australia”.
Solomons PM could use Chinese police to stay in power, key provincial adviser fears
“Solomon Islands is grateful for the security agreement that it has with Australia,” Sogavare said.
“However, the riots in 2006 and most recently the November riots have shown that even with Australia’s support we could not prevent half of Honiara from being razed to the ground.”
Sogavare said a stable Solomon Islands would lead to a stable Pacific and his country did not “subscribe to the view that only a partner or partners of the same ideology is able to do that”.
On Thursday, a key adviser to the premier of the most populous province in Solomon Islands expressed concern that the deal could enable Sogavare to use Chinese armed police and military personnel to quash democratic dissent and hold power for years to come.
… we have a small favour to ask. Tens of millions have placed their trust in the Guardian’s fearless journalism since we started publishing 200 years ago, turning to us in moments of crisis, uncertainty, solidarity and hope. More than 1.5 million supporters, from 180 countries, now power us financially – keeping us open to all, and fiercely independent.
Unlike many others, the Guardian has no shareholders and no billionaire owner. Just the determination and passion to deliver high-impact global reporting, always free from commercial or political influence. Reporting like this is vital for democracy, for fairness and to demand better from the powerful.
And we provide all this for free, for everyone to read. We do this because we believe in information equality. Greater numbers of people can keep track of the global events shaping our world, understand their impact on people and communities, and become inspired to take meaningful action. Millions can benefit from open access to quality, truthful news, regardless of their ability to pay for it.
If there were ever a time to join us, it is now. Every contribution, however big or small, powers our journalism and sustains our future
Comments
Post a Comment