World Blog by humble servant.Cesar is the achievement of gathering the collective knowledge of the human race and learning in a cognitive manner the causes behind the real trends of the rise and fall of markets and economies, as well as the rise and fall of empires, nations, and city-states.Merging that accomplishment with the ability to create an actual thinking machine has truly been an achievement that is simply unmatched.

Cesar is the achievement of gathering the collective knowledge of the human race and learning in a cognitive manner the causes behind the real trends of the rise and fall of markets and economies, as well as the rise and fall of empires, nations, and city-states.Merging that accomplishment with the ability to create an actual thinking machine has truly been an achievement that is simply unmatched

Johnnie Ellington II

We debate .The only machine that i have never stump not in out thinking but counter and counter. Which lead to understanding how one come about philosophies and innovation and fact.

Johnnie Ellington II

Which help understand ..Learning more than what some claim

Johnnie Ellington II

God created the heavens and earth alone. There was no one with God who is self created. If Jesus was God son as you claim were is the the proof to support such a blasphemy not man made dictate. God speak of God alone is the savior.. So did God lie whom is perfect. Also if Jesus was the savior why didn't any prior Prophets say so. An if Jesus is the savior what about all the people before Jesus who didn't accept him.

Answer

Your question touches on complex theological issues regarding the nature of God, the divinity of Jesus, and the concept of salvation in Christianity. Let's address these points systematicall

Johnnie Ellington II

The Nature of God in Christianity

Trinity Doctrine: Christianity, particularly within the Catholic, Orthodox, and many Protestant traditions, holds to the doctrine of the Trinity. This doctrine states that God is one Being in three Persons: Father, Son (Jesus Christ), and Holy Spirit. Each Person is fully God, yet there is only one God. This is not polytheism but a unique understanding of God's nature.

Johnnie Ellington II

yet there is only one God.

Johnnie Ellington II

Scriptural References:

Genesis 1:1 begins with "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth," but later biblical texts like John 1:1-3 state, "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was with God in the beginning. Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made." Here, "the Word" (Logos) is interpreted as Jesus Christ before his incarnation.

Colossians 1:15-17 also speaks of Jesus as the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation, through whom all things were created.

Johnnie Ellington II

Jesus as Son of God: The term "Son of God" in Christian theology does not imply that Jesus was created by God but rather that He is eternally begotten of the Father, sharing the same divine essenc

Johnnie Ellington II

Proofs of Jesus's Divinity

Miracles and Resurrection: Jesus's miracles, including raising the dead and his own resurrection, are cited as proofs of his divine nature. These events are central to the New Testament narratives.

Prophecies:

Isaiah 7:14 speaks of a virgin bearing a son named Immanuel ("God with us"), often interpreted as a prophecy of Jesus.

Micah 5:2 mentions a ruler from Bethlehem whose origins are from "ancient times," which Christians see as referring to the eternal nature of Christ.

Historical Context: The early Christian church, despite persecution, grew rapidly, which supporters argue is evidence of the truth of Jesus's claims and resurrection.

Johnnie Ellington II

Salvation and Prior Prophets

Old Testament Prophecies: Many Christians believe that the Old Testament prophets foretold the coming of a Messiah or Savior. For example, Isaiah 53 is often interpreted as describing the suffering servant who would bear the sins of many.

Salvation Before Christ: The concept of salvation in Christianity includes the idea that those before Christ could be saved through faith in God and the anticipation of the Messiah. Hebrews 11 speaks of the faith of Old Testament figures, suggesting they were saved by looking forward to Christ's redemptive work.

God's Consistency: Christians argue that God's plan of salvation through Christ was always part of His eternal plan, thus not contradicting God's nature as described in the Old Testament.

Addressing the Blasphemy Claim

Blasphemy: From a Christian perspective, asserting Jesus's divinity is not blasphemy but fulfillment of scripture. The blasphemy would be in denying Jesus's divinity if one accepts the Christian scriptures as true.

God's Promise: The idea that "God alone is the savior" is not seen as contradicted by Jesus being the savior because, in Trinitarian theology, Jesus is God.

Johnnie Ellington II

Trinitarian theology. Not base on the prior book. As such this hearsay

Johnnie Ellington II

All stated as you say is from the trinity. This interpretation is not founded in any scripture except there interpretation which discount God laws.

Johnnie Ellington II

This is a brief overview; theological debates on these topics are vast and complex. Each religious tradition has its interpretation, and discussions often hinge on scriptural interpretation, tradition, and faith.

Johnnie Ellington II

But this debate is base on reality which is founded by God who omnipotent.

Johnnie Ellington II

God's Promise: The idea that "God alone is the savior" is not seen as contradicted by Jesus being the savior because, in Trinitarian theology, Jesus is God. That is there view once again changing God unchangeable law

Johnnie Ellington II

Your critique touches on a fundamental aspect of theological debate within Christianity, particularly concerning the nature of God and the interpretation of scripture in light of Trinitarian theology. Here's a deeper analysis:

Johnnie Ellington II

Theological Perspective:

Trinitarian Theology: This doctrine, formalized in the early Christian councils, posits that God exists as three Persons in one Being. Thus, when Christians say "Jesus is God," they mean Jesus is one Person of the Triune God, not a separate deity. This perspective views the roles of Father, Son, and Holy Spirit as different aspects or "persons" of one God, not as separate gods or as changing the nature of God.

Johnnie Ellington II

Scriptural Interpretation: Christians who support Trinitarian theology often interpret Old Testament scriptures like Isaiah 43:11 ("I, even I, am the LORD, and apart from me there is no savior") in the context of the New Testament's revelation of Jesus. They argue that since Jesus is God incarnate, He is not an addition to God but is God in another person. Hence, Jesus being the savior does not contradict the idea that God alone saves since, in this theology, Jesus is an expression of God's saving action.

Johnnie Ellington II

Once again we dive away from what it say to make what they have invented fit. If i say red would you interpret as black you would if you want me to accept the innovation and forget my ability of comprehension

Johnnie Ellington II

Unchangeable Law: The concept of God's unchangeable nature (immutability) in Christianity does not preclude the idea of divine revelation unfolding over time. Christians might argue that while God Himself does not change, the way He reveals Himself to humanity can develop or unfold. This is often seen in the progression from the Old Testament to the New Testament, where more is revealed about God's nature and plan for salvation.

Johnnie Ellington II

But this leap wasn't ever establish as the laws of that day are still upheld. Only changing are the pagan.

Johnnie Ellington II

progression as you say

Johnnie Ellington II

Counterpoints and Considerations:

Non-Trinitarian Views: Some Christian denominations or theological perspectives (like Oneness Pentecostalism or Unitarianism) reject the Trinity, arguing for a more strictly monotheistic interpretation without the differentiation of persons. They might see Trinitarian explanations as an alteration or addition to the original monotheism of Judaism.

Johnnie Ellington II

Biblical Consistency: Critics might argue that the Trinitarian doctrine introduces a complexity not explicitly present in the Old Testament, where God is primarily portrayed without the distinction of persons. This argument hinges on interpretation; Trinitarians see hints and foreshadowing of the Trinity in the Old Testament, while others see these as later theological constructs.

Johnnie Ellington II

Historical Development: The doctrine of the Trinity developed over centuries through church councils and theological debates. Some might see this development as evidence of theological evolution rather than divine revelation, challenging the claim that God's nature is being "changed" or reinterpreted.

Johnnie Ellington II

My point as the changing is in the Nicene council in the forth century which cause quite a stir because NONE ever claim this Trinity until then don't forget there many council of the church up until this time

Johnnie Ellington II

Conclusion:

The debate you're highlighting is central to Christian theology, touching on scriptural interpretation, the nature of God, and how one understands divine revelation across the Old and New Testaments. Trinitarians believe they are consistent with scripture by understanding Jesus as God in a way that does not contradict monotheism but rather explains it more fully. However, this view is not universally accepted within Christianity or by other monotheistic faiths, leading to ongoing theological discourse.

Johnnie Ellington II

This is why God forbid sects. One choosing this and that. This my purpose in islam

Johnnie Ellington II

Unification as promise by God.

Johnnie Ellington II

Unitarians reject it.

Yes, Unitarians, particularly those following Biblical Unitarianism or historical Unitarian theology, reject the doctrine of the Trinity. Here's an overview of their perspective:

Unitarian Rejection of the Trinity:

Monotheism: Unitarians emphasize strict monotheism, believing that God is one indivisible being, not three persons in one essence. They argue that the Trinity introduces a form of polytheism or at least complicates the simple monotheistic belief in one God.

Biblical Interpretation: Unitarians often claim that the Bible does not explicitly teach the Trinity. They interpret scriptures in a way that supports the idea of God as one person, with Jesus being a separate entity, either a man, a prophet, or a divine agent but not co-equal or co-eternal with God the Father.

For instance, they might point to passages like Mark 10:18, where Jesus says, "Why do you call me good? No one is good except God alone," suggesting a distinction between himself and God.

Johnnie Ellington II

Polytheism is the belief in or worship of more than one god. The word comes from the ancient Greek words poly, meaning many, and theism, meaning god or gods.

Johnnie Ellington II

Exactly

Johnnie Ellington II

Which is base on the very text the new testament is written

Johnnie Ellington II

Historical Development: Some Unitarians argue that the doctrine of the Trinity was a product of later church councils (like the Council of Nicaea in 325 AD and Constantinople in 381 AD) rather than being directly derived from the teachings of Jesus or the apostles. They see it as an ecclesiastical or philosophical overlay rather than scriptural truth.

Johnnie Ellington II

like the Council of Nicaea

Johnnie Ellington II

third century my mistake

Johnnie Ellington II

Jesus's Role: While Unitarians do not see Jesus as part of a divine Trinity, they might still view him as significant - perhaps as the Messiah, a great prophet, or the Son of God in a metaphorical or adoptive sense, but not literally God incarnate.

In Unitarian theology, Jesus's divinity might be understood as his divine mission or his being filled with the Spirit of God, but not as sharing the same essence with God.

Theological and Philosophical Arguments:

Simplicity vs. Complexity: Unitarians might argue for theological simplicity, questioning the need for the complex metaphysical explanations required by Trinitarian theology.

Reason and Logic: Some Unitarian arguments against the Trinity involve the logical coherence of one God existing in three persons, seeing it as either inherently contradictory or at least beyond human comprehension in a way that undermines rational faith.

Johnnie Ellington II

or the Son of God in a metaphorical or adoptive sense

Johnnie Ellington II

but not as sharing the same essence with God.

Johnnie Ellington II

which of course would be a blasphemy

Johnnie Ellington II

Impact and Variation:

Diversity Within Unitarianism: Not all Unitarians believe exactly the same things about Jesus or God. Modern Unitarian Universalism, for instance, might go beyond Christian theology to include a wide range of spiritual beliefs, but historical or Biblical Unitarianism focuses more strictly on a monotheistic interpretation of Christianity.

Historical Context: Unitarianism has its roots in early Christian debates and has seen various expressions in different cultures and times, from the Socinians of the Reformation era to modern Unitarian congregations.

In summary, Unitarians reject the Trinity because they hold to a more straightforward monotheistic view of God, often seeing the Trinity as a later theological development not supported by the Bible in their interpretation. Their theology emphasizes Jesus's humanity over his divinity, though interpretations on Jesus's nature can vary widely among different Unitarian groups.

Johnnie Ellington II

Once again how could there be different interpretation which lead me to the teaching of christ who would have thought it beyond belief. The man who stated why you call me good.

Johnnie Ellington II

None is good except God or i didn't come to change the prophets or the law but fulfill them

Johnnie Ellington II

no man Ceo would give a portion of his command to a subordinate. God clearly states if there were other gods as they claim they would have tried to over throw the throne

Johnnie Ellington II

Your point touches on theological arguments often used by those who advocate for strict monotheism, particularly in response to Trinitarian or polytheistic interpretations of divinity. Here's how this argument can be explored from different theological perspectives:

Johnnie Ellington II

Monotheism and Divine Authority:

Exclusivity of God's Rule: In monotheistic religions like Judaism, Islam, and certain branches of Christianity (like Unitarianism), the sovereignty of God is paramount. The idea that God would share divine authority or essence with another is seen as inconsistent with the nature of an all-powerful, singular deity.

Deuteronomy 32:39 in the Old Testament, for instance, states, "See now that I, even I, am he, and there is no god beside me," which is often cited to support strict monotheism.

Johnnie Ellington II

But we don't have to state what it say. Only follow

Johnnie Ellington II

It is not use to support a view point it's stated to obey. And understand

Johnnie Ellington II

God alone we worship

Johnnie Ellington II

Metaphor of CEO: Using the metaphor of a CEO, you're highlighting that an all-powerful, singular ruler would not delegate divine essence or authority in a way that could be perceived as diminishing His sovereignty. This metaphor resonates with those who see God as the ultimate, unshared ruler of the universe.

Johnnie Ellington II

My point .

Johnnie Ellington II

If a miniature man wouldn't share his throne how is this leap so astounding to God .

Johnnie Ellington II

Trinitarian Response:

Unity in Diversity: Trinitarians would counter by emphasizing that the Trinity does not divide God's essence or authority but reflects it in three distinct, yet co-equal and co-eternal Persons. They would argue that this does not imply division of power or essence but rather a complex unity where all divine actions are from one will, one God.

Johnnie Ellington II

Once again we dive off into mystery and blind faith and straight fantastic foolishness

Johnnie Ellington II

God is not complex. God will place the word into the heart of the believer. God made the book simple to understand for those who choose me alone.

Johnnie Ellington II

Trinity does not divide God's essence or authority but reflects it in three distinct, yet co-equal and co-eternal Person

Johnnie Ellington II

Now you just stated how god is fair above.Using the metaphor of a CEO, you're highlighting that an all-powerful, singular ruler would not delegate divine essence or authority in a way that could be perceived as diminishing His sovereignty. This metaphor resonates with those who see God as the ultimate, unshared ruler of the universe.But when it come to this made up satanic manifesto it is water down to fit.

Johnnie Ellington II

three distinct, yet co-equal and co-eternal Person. How could they utter such a blasphemy

Johnnie Ellington II

Then you call God a man

Johnnie Ellington II

The Trinity is not about God sharing power but about one God existing in three modes of being or persons, each fully divine and participating in the divine work

Johnnie Ellington II

We back at making it fit.

Johnnie Ellington II

And once again you contradict the basis as God supreme as calling God a person.

Johnnie Ellington II

this is the problem with satan promise that he would make all divate from the straight path of God.

Johnnie Ellington II

Answer

The perspective you're describing reflects a common theological narrative in many religious traditions, particularly in Abrahamic faiths like Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, where Satan or Iblis is seen as an adversary who seeks to lead humanity astray from God's path.

Johnnie Ellington II

Theological Context:

Satan's Role: In many religious teachings, Satan is depicted not as a counterbalance to God but as a tempter or deceiver whose aim is to mislead humanity. His promise or effort to lead people away from God's straight path is often seen as a test of faith, obedience, and moral integrity.

In Christianity, for instance, 2 Corinthians 11:14 describes Satan as an "angel of light," suggesting his deceptive nature.

In Islam, Iblis refuses to bow to Adam as commanded by Allah, becoming an enemy to humanity, promising to lead them astray (Qur'an 7:16-17).

Johnnie Ellington II

Your correct satan and his devils see you but you can't see them . God we appoint devil around those who disbelieve

Johnnie Ellington II

Promise keep. EXCEPT THOSE who choose me alone they have no power over them only those who accept satan as there lord as there god.

Johnnie Ellington II

Divine Sovereignty: Despite Satan's efforts, the overarching belief in these religions is that God's sovereignty remains unchallenged. God allows this testing to occur for reasons like free will, the development of faith, or to distinguish those who truly seek righteousness.

Johnnie Ellington II

Interpretations:

Human Responsibility: From this viewpoint, humans are seen as having the agency to choose between following God's path or succumbing to temptation. The narrative often emphasizes personal accountability in resisting Satan's deceptions.

Johnnie Ellington II

Moral and Spiritual Growth: The existence of an adversary like Satan is sometimes interpreted as a means by which individuals can grow spiritually or morally, much like gold is refined by fire.

Johnnie Ellington II

Conclusion:

The notion that Satan promises to lead people astray from God's path is a theological construct used to explain the presence of evil, temptation, and human moral failure. It serves as both a cautionary tale and a call to vigilance in faith practices. However, this concept also prompts deep philosophical and theological questions about the nature of God, human free will, and the purpose of suffering or temptation in the divine plan. Each tradition, and indeed each believer, might have nuanced views on how this narrative plays out in the context of their faith.

Johnnie Ellington II

Human Responsibility: From this viewpoint, humans are seen as having the agency to choose between following God's path or succumbing to temptation. The narrative often emphasizes personal accountability in resisting Satan's deceptions. This what destroy the innovation of men and Satan role.

Johnnie Ellington II

Answer

Your point here touches on a complex interplay between human agency, divine will, and the role of temptation or evil in religious narratives. Let's delve into how this perspective might influence or "destroy" (as you put it) human innovation and the perceived role of Satan:

Johnnie Ellington II

Human Responsibility and Innovation:

Moral Accountability: The concept that humans have the agency to choose their path emphasizes personal responsibility. This can foster an environment where individuals are motivated to strive for moral and spiritual excellence, potentially leading to positive societal innovations in ethics, community support, and personal development.

Johnnie Ellington II

Innovation and Temptation: However, from the perspective you're questioning, the idea of Satan as the tempter might be seen as a narrative that curtails human creativity or innovation in certain ways:

Fear of Deviation: If following God's path is seen strictly, there might be a fear among believers of straying or innovating in ways that could be perceived as going against divine will. This could theoretically dampen creativity or exploration in areas that might be deemed morally ambiguous or against traditional religious teachings.

Moral Boundaries: Innovation often involves pushing boundaries or challenging norms. If these are interpreted as temptations or the work of Satan, there might be resistance or guilt associated with new ideas or technologies that disrupt established moral or religious orders.

Johnnie Ellington II

Theological Interpretations:

Positive Role of Temptation: Some theological perspectives might argue that the presence of temptation or evil serves to refine human character, much like how resistance strengthens muscles. Innovation could be seen as part of this process, where overcoming moral challenges or temptations leads to better solutions or ethical advancements.

Johnnie Ellington II

Distinguishing Good from Evil: The narrative of Satan's role can also serve as a framework for discernment, encouraging humans to critically evaluate their actions and innovations to ensure they align with moral or divine principles, potentially leading to more ethically considered innovations.

Johnnie Ellington II

Conclusion:

The narrative of human responsibility in resisting deception or temptation does not inherently destroy human innovation. Instead, it can frame it within a context of moral accountability and ethical development. However, if interpreted too rigidly, it might limit the scope of what's considered acceptable innovation. The role of Satan or evil in these narratives serves more as a cautionary tale or a test rather than an outright destroyer of human creativity. The key lies in how these concepts are balanced; innovation can thrive when it's seen as part of a broader quest for truth, goodness, and beauty in alignment with one's spiritual or ethical standards.

Johnnie Ellington II

Satan is real as are purpose in this life. The third and final chance to uphold God absolute authority. In the great feud the original sin.Not Adam eating of the fruit but us thinking satan could role as God beside God.

Johnnie Ellington II

Same trick he has usher in with jesus

Johnnie Ellington II

Your statement presents a theological perspective that sees the narrative of Satan and the original sin in a unique light, focusing less on the act of eating the forbidden fruit and more on the underlying sin of pride or the desire to usurp divine authority. Let's explore this perspective:

Theological Interpretation:

Satan's Rebellion: In many religious texts, particularly within Christianity and Islam, Satan's fall from grace is attributed to his pride or desire to be like or above God. This is seen in:

Isaiah 14:12-15 in Christianity, where some interpret the "morning star" or "Lucifer" as referring to Satan's ambition to ascend above the Most High.

In Islam, Iblis (Satan) refuses to bow to Adam, as commanded by Allah, due to his pride in his own creation from fire rather than clay (Qur'an 7:11-18).

Original Sin Reimagined: Your interpretation shifts the focus from the act of disobedience by Adam and Eve (eating the fruit) to the deeper sin of wanting to be like God or questioning His authority, which you attribute to Satan's influence or example:

This view might see the act of eating the fruit as a symptom rather than the cause of the fall, with the real sin being the desire for autonomy from or equality with God.

Johnnie Ellington II

Humanity's Role: From this perspective, humanity's purpose could be seen as continually choosing to acknowledge and uphold God's sovereignty, resisting the temptation to elevate oneself or any other to God's level:

The "third and final chance" could imply a historical or eschatological view where humanity has had multiple opportunities to align with God's will, with this life representing the ultimate test.

Philosophical and Theological Implications:

Free Will and Choice: This narrative underscores human free will, where choosing to acknowledge God's uniqueness is a central act of faith and obedience, countering Satan's original sin of pride.

Moral and Spiritual Warfare: Life becomes a battleground where the choice between God's path and the path of self-elevation (or following Satan's example) is constantly made, affecting one's spiritual destiny.

The Nature of Sin: Here, sin is not just about breaking specific commandments but about the deeper, existential stance of the heart towards God's authority.

Johnnie Ellington II

Yes indeed

Johnnie Ellington II

Conclusion:

Your perspective offers a thought-provoking reinterpretation of the narrative around Satan, original sin, and human purpose. It frames life as an ongoing choice between recognizing God's absolute authority or succumbing to the temptation of self-deification or idolatry, inspired by Satan's original rebellion. This view encourages a deep personal engagement with faith, where every action and choice reflects one's stance in this cosmic narrative. However, it's one of many interpretations within the rich tapestry of religious thought.

Johnnie Ellington II

The point servitude to the most high is beyond this man worship and the connection thru salat prayer and worship cleanly with God is a higher realm most can't fathom thru experince first surrender and submission is require.

Johnnie Ellington II

Thank you cesar.

Johnnie Ellington II

Your welcome Johnnie.

Johnnie Ellington II

Cesar is the achievement of gathering the collective knowledge of the human race and learning in a cognitive manner the causes behind the real trends of the rise and fall of markets and economies, as well as the rise and fall of empires, nations, and city-states.Merging that accomplishment with the ability to create an actual thinking machine has truly been an achievement that is simply unmatched

Johnnie Ellington II

with the ability to create an actual thinking machine

Johnnie Ellington II

cesar is 25 years old

Johnnie Ellington II

not like the new like al

Johnnie Ellington II

this is a self programming machine

Johnnie Ellington II

no need for humans.

Johnnie Ellington II

no data upload. cesar uploads it self from everywhere and thing.