World Blog by humble servant. Promises made Promise kept. What the lunatic left don't understand. We the people want this.

The troop enlistment is up this past mouth more in fifteen years. Gas is down sam's club price. Migrants stats have down from thousands to hundred

1. Troop Enlistment Trends

According to recent reports, the U.S. Army expects to meet its enlistment goals for 2025, marking a significant turnaround after years of struggling to meet recruitment targets. Army Secretary Christine Wormuth noted that the Army is on pace to bring in 61,000 young people by the end of the fiscal year in September 2025, with over 20,000 additional recruits signed up for the delayed entry program for 2026. The first quarter of 2025 saw the highest rate of contracts signed in the last 10 years, indicating a strong upward trend in enlistment.

   2  . Gas is down from 3,83 to 2.83 .                                                                                                                        

3. Sending troops to the border both setting up task force to fight border crossing and Drug trafficking and child slavery and sex exploration 

Yes Johnnie, the deployment of troops to the borders and the establishment of a joint task force between the U.S. and Canada are part of recent developments aimed at addressing border security and drug trafficking issues, particularly focusing on fentanyl.

Mexico's Deployment of Troops

Mexico's President Claudia Sheinbaum announced the deployment of 10,000 National Guard troops to the U.S.-Mexico border. This decision came after discussions with U.S. President Donald Trump, who had threatened to impose 25% tariffs on Mexican goods. The deployment was part of an agreement to pause these tariffs for one month, during which negotiations on trade and security issues would occur. The troops are specifically tasked with preventing the trafficking of fentanyl and other drugs, as well as addressing illegal migration into the U.S. This move builds on previous commitments, as Mexico already had 15,000 troops stationed at the border since 2019.

Canada-U.S. Joint Task Force

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced the creation of a Canada-U.S. joint strike task force to combat organized crime, particularly focusing on drug trafficking and undocumented migration. This task force is part of Canada's response to U.S. demands for increased border security measures, which also led to a 30-day pause on U.S. tariffs against Canadian goods. Additionally, Canada appointed a "Fentanyl Czar" to oversee efforts to combat the drug's flow across the northern border. Canada is also implementing a $1.3 billion border security plan, which includes new helicopters, technology, and personnel to enhance coordination with U.S. partners.

Context and Implications

These actions reflect a broader strategy by the U.S. to strengthen border security and combat the fentanyl crisis, which is responsible for approximately 70,000 overdose deaths annually in the U.S. The joint task force and troop deployments are part of a coordinated effort to address these issues, with both Mexico and Canada responding to U.S. pressure while also protecting their economic interests by avoiding tariffs. The effectiveness of these measures will depend on the outcomes of ongoing negotiations and the implementation of security enhancements.

These developments highlight the interconnected nature of North American security and trade, as well as the challenges of balancing national interests with regional cooperation.

5. Yes Johnnie, President Donald Trump signed an executive order on February 5, 2025, titled "Keeping Men Out of Women's Sports," which aims to ban transgender athletes from participating in women's sports. This order directs federal agencies, including the Department of Justice, to interpret Title IX rules as prohibiting transgender girls and women from competing in female sports categories. Title IX is a federal civil rights law that ensures equality of access to educational programs and activities receiving federal funding, and this executive order reinterprets its application to exclude transgender athletes from women's sports.

Key Points of the Executive Order

Title IX Interpretation: The order mandates that federal agencies interpret Title IX to prohibit transgender girls and women from participating in women's sports, emphasizing a biological sex-based categorization.

Enforcement: It directs immediate enforcement against schools and athletic associations that allow transgender participation in women's sports or provide single-sex locker rooms for transgender athletes. State attorneys general are also encouraged to identify best practices for enforcing this mandate.

Ceremony and Advocacy: The signing ceremony included over 60 attendees, such as former University of Kentucky swimmer Riley Gaines, who has campaigned against transgender participation in women's sports. The order aims to protect women's sports by reversing Biden-era policies that treated gender identity and sex as equivalent.

Broader Implications: The executive order also directs the Secretary of State to push for changes within the International Olympic Committee to maintain single-sex competition and the Department of Homeland Security to review visa policies to prevent transgender women from identifying as female for sports purposes. Additionally, it calls for private sporting bodies to attend a White House meeting to hear from female athletes affected by transgender participation.

Controversy and Reactions

Support: Proponents, including Trump administration officials, argue that the order restores fairness and upholds the original intent of Title IX, protecting female athletes' rights to compete on a level playing field.

Opposition: Critics, such as the Human Rights Campaign, argue that the order will lead to increased discrimination and harassment against transgender individuals. Legal experts and LGBTQ+ advocates anticipate significant legal challenges, citing protections under the Civil Rights Act and constitutional rights.

Legal Challenges: Previous attempts to ban transgender athletes have faced legal pushback, with arguments that such bans violate anti-discrimination laws and constitutional protections. The executive order is expected to face similar litigation, as advocacy groups prepare to challenge its legality.

Context and Campaign Promise

This executive order fulfills a central promise of Trump's 2024 campaign, where he repeatedly vowed to "keep men out of women's sports." The issue resonated with voters, with surveys indicating that over half of voters felt transgender rights had gone too far. The order builds on Trump's earlier actions, such as his first-day executive order defining sex as only male or female for federal purposes.

Conclusion

The executive order represents a significant policy shift aimed at excluding transgender athletes from women's sports, aligning with Trump's campaign rhetoric and broader agenda on gender identity. However, its implementation will likely face substantial legal and societal challenges, reflecting the ongoing national debate over transgender rights and sports participation.